Showing posts with label seperate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label seperate. Show all posts

Sunday, March 11, 2012

BIDev Studio Merging 2 SSIS packages in to one

Hi,

I am new to the product and have set up an intergration service comprising of two seperate ssis packages. At present as far as i know I have to execute them one at a time. Is there any way of performing a single execute to run them both or alternatively merging them into a single package.

Any help would be greatfully appreciated.

Chris

Chris, there is an "Execute Package" task in SSIS that should do the trick for you... Just place two on the control flow and point to the packages you currently have.

You could also merge them into one package, but I have not tried to copy/paste tasks/flows from one package into another...

|||

Thanks Dan

The Execute Package works a treat.

Chris

BIDev Studio Merging 2 SSIS packages in to one

Hi,

I am new to the product and have set up an intergration service comprising of two seperate ssis packages. At present as far as i know I have to execute them one at a time. Is there any way of performing a single execute to run them both or alternatively merging them into a single package.

Any help would be greatfully appreciated.

Chris

Chris, there is an "Execute Package" task in SSIS that should do the trick for you... Just place two on the control flow and point to the packages you currently have.

You could also merge them into one package, but I have not tried to copy/paste tasks/flows from one package into another...

|||

Thanks Dan

The Execute Package works a treat.

Chris

Sunday, February 19, 2012

best way to run 45 queries in a row?

Hi,
I have created 45 queries that I need to run which will seperate and
stratify data. Each one has to be run one after the other. Right now I sit
there and muanually run them in the SQL Query Analyzer screen. Is there
something I can create to run them automatically, one after the other?
Thanks
If you have to do this more than once you can create a multistep Job or a DTS
package
http://sqlservercode.blogspot.com/
"John Jasper" wrote:

> Hi,
> I have created 45 queries that I need to run which will seperate and
> stratify data. Each one has to be run one after the other. Right now I sit
> there and muanually run them in the SQL Query Analyzer screen. Is there
> something I can create to run them automatically, one after the other?
> Thanks
|||You could copy and paste them all into one stored procedure, with some error
handling thrown in to exit and alert you if one failed...
Kevin Hill
President
3NF Consulting
www.3nf-inc.com/NewsGroups.htm
"John Jasper" <JohnJasper@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:74DA6630-0986-4014-AE2E-DACEDF9200D9@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I have created 45 queries that I need to run which will seperate and
> stratify data. Each one has to be run one after the other. Right now I
> sit
> there and muanually run them in the SQL Query Analyzer screen. Is there
> something I can create to run them automatically, one after the other?
> Thanks

best way to run 45 queries in a row?

Hi,
I have created 45 queries that I need to run which will seperate and
stratify data. Each one has to be run one after the other. Right now I sit
there and muanually run them in the SQL Query Analyzer screen. Is there
something I can create to run them automatically, one after the other?
ThanksIf you have to do this more than once you can create a multistep Job or a DT
S
package
http://sqlservercode.blogspot.com/
"John Jasper" wrote:

> Hi,
> I have created 45 queries that I need to run which will seperate and
> stratify data. Each one has to be run one after the other. Right now I si
t
> there and muanually run them in the SQL Query Analyzer screen. Is there
> something I can create to run them automatically, one after the other?
> Thanks|||You could copy and paste them all into one stored procedure, with some error
handling thrown in to exit and alert you if one failed...
Kevin Hill
President
3NF Consulting
www.3nf-inc.com/NewsGroups.htm
"John Jasper" <JohnJasper@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:74DA6630-0986-4014-AE2E-DACEDF9200D9@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I have created 45 queries that I need to run which will seperate and
> stratify data. Each one has to be run one after the other. Right now I
> sit
> there and muanually run them in the SQL Query Analyzer screen. Is there
> something I can create to run them automatically, one after the other?
> Thanks

best way to run 45 queries in a row?

Hi,
I have created 45 queries that I need to run which will seperate and
stratify data. Each one has to be run one after the other. Right now I sit
there and muanually run them in the SQL Query Analyzer screen. Is there
something I can create to run them automatically, one after the other?
ThanksIf you have to do this more than once you can create a multistep Job or a DTS
package
http://sqlservercode.blogspot.com/
"John Jasper" wrote:
> Hi,
> I have created 45 queries that I need to run which will seperate and
> stratify data. Each one has to be run one after the other. Right now I sit
> there and muanually run them in the SQL Query Analyzer screen. Is there
> something I can create to run them automatically, one after the other?
> Thanks|||You could copy and paste them all into one stored procedure, with some error
handling thrown in to exit and alert you if one failed...
--
Kevin Hill
President
3NF Consulting
www.3nf-inc.com/NewsGroups.htm
"John Jasper" <JohnJasper@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:74DA6630-0986-4014-AE2E-DACEDF9200D9@.microsoft.com...
> Hi,
> I have created 45 queries that I need to run which will seperate and
> stratify data. Each one has to be run one after the other. Right now I
> sit
> there and muanually run them in the SQL Query Analyzer screen. Is there
> something I can create to run them automatically, one after the other?
> Thanks

Thursday, February 16, 2012

best way to preserve all dependencies

I know ive asked this before and created seperate publications for tables
and views,etc in order to avoid conflicts such as view being created before
the table,etc..
What do u guys prefer as the best method to handle this, especially if
reinitialize a publication that has tables in it and it results in error as
the table properties has a drop to it and hence would not be able to drop as
a view is present..
There must be better ways to handle all of this . If only I could create one
publication for all objects belonging to one database ..if only all of the
dependencies were ordered.
Hassan,
like you, I have separate publications - one for tables, one for views and
one for UDFs.
AFAIK, dropping a table should be fine unless the view has been created
using schemabinding.
For those cases where dependency info of views is incorrect, sp_refreshview
is sometimes useful; sometimes use sp_addscriptexec; sometimes just add the
view manually on the subscriber when there is connectivity and there is only
one subscriber.
HTH,
Paul Ibison SQL Server MVP, www.replicationanswers.com
(recommended sql server 2000 replication book:
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602p.html)

Friday, February 10, 2012

Best way to compare two ENTIRE rows in seperate tables?

Hi folks, I've got a fairly easy one here me thinx. I'm looking for the best way to compare two entire rows from two seperate tables which have the same primary key.

Here's the basic lowdown:

I get some data every night from an external system (cache') via DTS. This is more or less my "master" data which drives my application. I have just been informed of an interesting constraint. If any of the data changes in the external system, those changes do not become effective until the first day of the ensuing fiscal quarter.

I'm solving this by running the DTS as normal, but populating a "duplicate" table which I will evaluate once per quarter for any changes. This is also the preferred solution because they would like to see a snapshot between current cache' data and the data my application is currently working with.

So, I end up with two identically structured tables. both tables have the same primary key and can be linked by an id field with relative ease. What I would like to do is a full row comparision once this join is established.

Right now I explicitly check the value of each column. ie:

WHERE t1.field1 <> t2.field1 OR t1.field2 <> t2.field2 OR t1.field3 <> t2.field3 ... etc

I'm hoping there is something buried in TSQL that I just don't know about that can handle comparing entire rows and tell me if they're different. Or perhaps there's another approach all-together.

Any thoughts?in my opinion, a JOIN with a column-by-column comparison is the best way to go

WHERE t1.field1 <> t2.field1 OR t1.field2 <> t2.field2 OR t1.field3 <> t2.field3

another approach:select pkey
from (
select * from table1
union
select * from table2
) u
group
by pkey
having count(*) = 2 since UNION removes duplicate rows, this query will give you all the pkeys which have something different

of course, then you gotta dive back into the tables to see the actual data, so ...|||I'm hoping there is something buried in TSQL that I just don't know about that can handle comparing entire rows and tell me if they're different. Or perhaps there's another approach all-together.There is.select a.pkey
from (select pkey, binary_checksum(*) as checkvalue from a) checksumsa
inner join (select pkey, binary_checksum(*) as checkvalue from b) as checksumb
on checksumsa.pkey = checksumsb.pkey
where checksumsa.checkvalue <> checksumsb.checkvalueBUT...binary_checksum values are not guaranteed to be different 100% of the time. There is a slight chance that the data could be modified in a way that leaves the checksum value unchanged, though the chances are slim.
Have you considered placing a trigger on your secondary table to set a flag when a record is updated? In the end, that may be your best approach.|||Sounds like Delta processing

http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/brettk/archive/2004/04/23/1281.aspx|||When using binary checksums (which is the way I do this comparison across several databases and tables we have) you also have to be aware that there can be differences reported if one of the servers being used in the comparison is a LINKED server...
http://www.dbforums.com/showthread.php?t=1213716|||Good stuff guys! I'll be leveraging a bit of what Rudy and Brett posted for what I need. I was positive there had to be a more elegant method than what I was doing...

Thanks duders!