Bi-Directional Transactional Replication - Problem

Two Servers,
1st 2nd
database a --> after replication a'
b' <-- after replication b
on 1st server a is replicated to 2nd
on 2nd server b is replicated to 1st
I tried with merge replication it is working fine.But if i tried to use
transactional replication it give some error like "access
violation".Using tansactional replication is it possible.plz help me to
slove this problem.
Regards,
Senthil prabu R
When you used sp_addsubscription, did you set @.loopback_detection=true?
Hilary Cotter
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"senthilprabu" <senthilpraburaju@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1125116841.951132.162370@.o13g2000cwo.googlegr oups.com...
> Two Servers,
> 1st 2nd
> database a --> after replication a'
> b' <-- after replication b
> on 1st server a is replicated to 2nd
> on 2nd server b is replicated to 1st
> I tried with merge replication it is working fine.But if i tried to use
> transactional replication it give some error like "access
> violation".Using tansactional replication is it possible.plz help me to
> slove this problem.
> Regards,
> Senthil prabu R
>

Bi-directional Transaction Replication

Two Servers,

1st 2nd
database a ---> after replication a'
b' <--- after replication b

on 1st server a is replicated to 2nd
on 2nd server b is replicated to 1st

I tried with merge replication it is working fine.But if i tried to use
transactional replication it give some error like "access
violation".Using tansactional replication is it possible.plz help me to
slove this problem.

Regards,
Senthil prabu RI have no idea myself, but under "Nonpartitioned, Bidirectional,
Transactional Replication", Books Online says that to implement
bidirectional transactional replication "substantial customization and
programming is usually required."

So you might get a better response in
microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication, as it seems to be something
quite specialized.

Simon